Last revised 01-16-2012;
All blue highlighted text links to
additional notes and information
All blue highlighted text links to
additional notes and information
"Just because something is
legal, doesn't mean it's
right..."
legal, doesn't mean it's
right..."
Here is why...
This page is
incomplete and still
being worked on...
incomplete and still
being worked on...
Click here for Tiffany Cone (Ne Nelson) and "Cash for
Keys." By the way, the "agreement" she says we had did
not exist; it was a complete fabrication on her part.
Keys." By the way, the "agreement" she says we had did
not exist; it was a complete fabrication on her part.
Below is the essence of Cone's testimony in Rebuild
America vs. Milner in which it is clear from her own
testimony that she attempted - and succeeded - using
deceptive means, an empty promise and a bald threat
in getting Patricia Milner to sign away the family home.
Fortunately, in this case, not only was the tax sale
voided for lack of sufficient notice, but the fraudulently
acquired quitclaim deed was also voided:
America vs. Milner in which it is clear from her own
testimony that she attempted - and succeeded - using
deceptive means, an empty promise and a bald threat
in getting Patricia Milner to sign away the family home.
Fortunately, in this case, not only was the tax sale
voided for lack of sufficient notice, but the fraudulently
acquired quitclaim deed was also voided:
<< ¶ 4. Wachovia Bank, for Magnolia Investors, conveyed its
interest in the property by a quitclaim deed to Rebuild America.
Rebuild America then began communications with Patricia Milner.
Tiffany Cone, a representative of Rebuild America, testified that
she spoke with Patricia Milner who was interested in purchasing
the property from Rebuild America. Cone testified that she asked
if the Milners would be willing to sign a quitclaim deed to create a
tidier file in accordance with Rebuild America's standard
procedure. However, Patricia Milner testified as follows:
[Cone] called me and told me that REO America had bought our
house at a land sale and that they owned the property. She also
told me that if I was [sic] to sign the quit[claim] deed to her, for
her, that they would make sure that they could find someone to
refinance the house and that we could keep the house, that if I did
not sign the papers, that they would give us 30 days and we would
have to move out, that they would evict us.
The Milners signed a quitclaim deed conveying their interest in
the property to Rebuild America on November 3, 2006, the day
after the complaint in this case was filed on November 2, 2006.
¶ 5. The chancellor considered the testimony and evidence
presented at trial, and he held that: (1) the tax sale should be set
aside for the chancery clerk's failure to comply with the statutory
notice requirements, and (2) the quitclaim deed from the Milners
to Rebuild America should be set aside for the lack of proper and
adequate consideration.>>
interest in the property by a quitclaim deed to Rebuild America.
Rebuild America then began communications with Patricia Milner.
Tiffany Cone, a representative of Rebuild America, testified that
she spoke with Patricia Milner who was interested in purchasing
the property from Rebuild America. Cone testified that she asked
if the Milners would be willing to sign a quitclaim deed to create a
tidier file in accordance with Rebuild America's standard
procedure. However, Patricia Milner testified as follows:
[Cone] called me and told me that REO America had bought our
house at a land sale and that they owned the property. She also
told me that if I was [sic] to sign the quit[claim] deed to her, for
her, that they would make sure that they could find someone to
refinance the house and that we could keep the house, that if I did
not sign the papers, that they would give us 30 days and we would
have to move out, that they would evict us.
The Milners signed a quitclaim deed conveying their interest in
the property to Rebuild America on November 3, 2006, the day
after the complaint in this case was filed on November 2, 2006.
¶ 5. The chancellor considered the testimony and evidence
presented at trial, and he held that: (1) the tax sale should be set
aside for the chancery clerk's failure to comply with the statutory
notice requirements, and (2) the quitclaim deed from the Milners
to Rebuild America should be set aside for the lack of proper and
adequate consideration.>>
For a brief
summary
go to this
link...
